Art Work

 

Recent Sculptures

A Celebration Of Paper

Tri-Dimensional Collages

Additional Sculptures

 

Public Art

 

Commissions 

The Madi Book

The Madi Building

 

About The Artist

 

Madi Intro 

Reviews

Biography

Current Exhibitions

Contact Us

Madi-Elsewhere

Additional Links

 

 

 



MADI - ELSEWHERE

Many contemporary art movements have folded, whilst others survive as curios or as historical references.  The MADI art movement, on the other hand, emerged with a new lease of life during the second half of the 1980s, and now has over one hundred member artists spanning fourteen nationalities and many more cultures and backgrounds than could be quantified.

MADI art left behind the traditional frame, and instead chose to move towards polygonal, convex and concave forms, thereby creating multi-layered and articulated surfaces.  The use of animation and the launching of the “coplanals” gave MADI its playful personality. 

MADI creates autonomous visual objects, where the canvas and the sculpture often blend together, rubbing out all traces of the formal boundaries which can be found in most other art forms.  It can be further described:

“The pictorial or sculptural object ceases to be isolated but becomes one with its environs. A painting would no longer be a speck on the wall, nor would be as in the North American Abstract Expressionist movement, a work destined – by its own gigantic form – to blitzkrieg and ultimate replace a superfluous support. Rather, the background (the wall, a panel, etc) on which a Madi painting is displayed would become an integral part of the work as would the spatial elements embedded in the piece (the cut-outs, irregular planes and so forth). Last but not least, the viewer, who could at will change the proportional relationships of the work and thus create a piece beyond the control of the artist, also becomes a constitutive component of the creative process.” 2

MADI, (and I quote Guillermo Gregorio), “invents and produces spaces,” and not only in the context of its relationship with the wall. Whilst Cubists fragmented space, Madis penetrate it. MADI excavates, avoiding compact structures. As the sculpture gains complexity, MADI creates new openings; space is no longer an illusion, but becomes an integral and tangible part of the object.

Still, MADI art can go much much further.

On the eve of the MADI exhibition at the Chateau Saint-Cirq Lapopié in 1993, Carmelo Arden Quin, founder of the MADI movement wrote: “The sempiternal orthogonal support still used by all modern artists annoys me. Let us create new combinations of planes, surfaces and volumes.” 3

It is not enough to start knawing away at the corners of the square or the rectangle to become a MADI artist. One needs to create from source a purely polygonal, original and personal form. By all means, go ahead and erect monuments in memoriam of Mondrian and Malevitch, but please, let us acknowledge and embrace the present and future of modern art.

MADI may have shattered the Renaissance rigidity of the square and rectangle, but look inside the majority of homes, and what do we see? On each computer, the most famous emblem of our technological culture is always omnipresent before our eyes; and it is the MADI-like irregularly shaped version of the Mondrian grid which forms the famous Microsoft logo. Yet, floral or ornithological images still crowd our walls, proving, that in the visual arts, we have a lot of catching up to do.  We have crossed the threshold of the third millennium but the perception of the visual arts by the majority of humanity remains entrenched in the nineteenth century.

GEOMETRY IS BEAUTIFUL

MADI art challenges the monopoly which the Surrealists have had on our subconscious. Yes, these painters were masters, but they always drew their inspiration from literary origins. When MADI art travels into the subconscious, it brings back lozenges, triangles, meanders and circles from the Greek Art of the 7th century B.C., knows today as the Geometric Age. Alternatively, Celtic diagonal lines are transposed to the artform, as described by Romilly Allen: “The fertility of imagination exhibited in the production of so many beautiful patterns by combining diagonal straight lines in every conceivable way is really amazing.”

By travelling deeper into our psyche, we find that the same lines, curves, diagonals, zigzags and spirals have been played out in subliminal yet inspirational symphonies from the beginning of time.

MADI chose a geometric language, believing that geometry is not only at the origin of all natural forms but also, at the basis of our atavistic memory.

Give a child a piece of chalk or a crayon. At the age of two, the child will draw circles. To express itself, a child will look to geometry and will, in most cases, be quite inventive. That is, until the time when linear and uniform “education” will make it slowly but surely lose its inventive personality.

We live in a world transformed by psychoanalysis, relativity, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, and philosophy of chaos. Yet, what do we teach our children in art class? If we were to follow in the footsteps of a well-known Florida critic, “one should reproduce the Sarasota sunset.” MADI artists think of sunsets as very beautiful, but unlike this critic, we do not believe that these constitute an art object.

Microscopes and telescopes, which both allow us to see what is normally invisible to the naked eye, show us that there is indeed something “divine” about geometry. Look at these examples: the arched colours of the rainbow; the ripples of water in a pond; the profusion of concentric shapes in the wings of the butterfly; the stars moving in circles around the sky; spherical drops of water falling from the sky. And what about the planets’ movements on ellipses, the swirling spiral of hurricanes, and the perfectly hexagonal snowflake? And why do viruses always develop into a geometrical shape? 4

Every year, the French eagerly await for the arrival of the Beaujolais Nouveau, a young, red wine with a strong personality. At the outset, no one ever knows if the current Beaujolais grape will succeed or not, but nevertheless, the wine makers always invest renewed passion into the process, in the hopes that the current year’s brew will be the best.

Like these wine makers, I believe that the MADI artist needs to display the same sense of rejuvenation, daring and enthusiasm with each new work of art. To constantly innovate whilst maintaining a fresh approach to one’s work is paramount as an artist. In geometric art, MADI takes after Gauguin who said one should “have the right to dare everything.”

I would like to see an art, an asymmetrical architecture, which goes beyond repetitive surfaces. Let us go beyond minimalism and concrete art.5  “The “human mind is attached to symmetry. However, perfect symmetry is repetitive and predictable, and our minds also like surprises, so we often consider imperfect symmetry to be more beautiful than exact mathematical symmetry…Symmetry breaking is a more dynamic idea.” 6

Even the most serious MADI artists can be described as playful. The structured forms and the imaginative, rich, warm and playful quality of MADI may help provide an answer to the “angst”, the confusion and the feeling of dislocation so often experienced in the modern world.

Johan Huizinga, the Danish philosopher, writes that “genuine, pure play is one of the main bases of civilization… it is the ‘fun-element’ that characterizes the essence of play… [Nature] gives us play with its tension, its mirth and its fun.” 7

In 1997, the Reina Sofia museum in Madrid, Spain, held a retrospective entitled “Arte MADI.” A celebration of its 50 years of existence, the retrospective brought together 55 artists and 10 nationalities. Spanish critics unanimously described this event as a “genuine festival” thanks to the open character of the MADI artists who were “opposed to all dogmas” and due to the “peculiarity and variety of the MADI creations”.

EL Pais, a Spanish newspaper with the largest circulation, entitled its MADI article “The refreshing look of MADI art”. Refreshing is indeed the word which sums up our movement.  Maria Lluisa Borras, the show’s curator, confirmed this by saying that “no other art movement equals MADI in the vigour, breadth and the joy that it displays.”

Like Matissse, I believe that “it is indispensable, all of one’s life, to preserve a child’s fresh and innocent relation to the things of this world.” It is this constant feeling of playfulness that, as a MADI artist, I am always trying to irradiate from my art.

“Really to play, a man must play like a child.” 8

 Notes:

1

The colplanals are one of the summits of Arden Quin’s discoveries. Composed of several polygons, the work is not only mobile, but each of its positions can b4e modified through a series of minute variations. It is undeniably in these structures that the basic premises of kinetic art can be found.” Alexandre de la Salle: Arden Quin ou la Passion d’Inventer, Paris 1963.

2

Shelley Goodman, « When Art First Jumped Out of his Cage” (Extracted from Arden Quin biography, now being written), 2001

3

Guillermo Gregorio, architect, music composer and professor at Purdue University. “Carmelo Arden Quin, la Fuerza de la Presencia.” Chicago 1999

4

All examples extracted from Ian Stewart, Nature’s Numbers, The Unreal Reality of Mathematics. Published by Basic Books 1995.

5

With time, the personalities of the MADI movement and of “Arte Concreto” have become more distinct. The former broke away with the formal, adding a substantial dose of fantasy coupled with its playful (“ludique”) characteristics. The latter now concentrates on theories and minimalism. MADI works are worlds apart from Arte Concreto when one looks at how versatile the movement is in its research and in the language it uses: poetry, tales, novels, theatre… even dance and music.” Nelly Perazzo, Vanguardias de la Decada del 40. Museo Silvori, Buenos Airesm Argentina 1960.

6

Ian Stewart, op.cit.

7

Johan Huizinga, “Homo Ludens, a study of the element of the play in culture”. English translation published by The Beacon Press, Boston, 1955

8

Johan Huizinga, op. cit.